
Perhaps surprisingly, 100 Banned Books: Censorship Histories of World Literature by Nicholas J. Karolides, Margaret Bald, and Dawn B. Sova has been published in mainland China (as 西方历史上的100部禁书). I held a copy in my hand as late as today, and there is a reference to it here. Note the reference to the publisher (出版) in Beijing, 北京.
But perhaps it is not that surprising after all. A strategy Beijing has recently applied to defend itself against accusations of human right abuses has been to attack the West in its turn for the same thing. If the US can keep people without trial in Guantanamo, why cannot we stretch the laws? is the logic.
Likewise 100 Banned Books shows that the West has a long tradition of banning classical world literature, so why would China be unable to ban literature in its own country?
Whether China's logic is very valid or not, is not that interesting. What is interesting is that it is difficult to take human rights criticism seriously from any country that does not respect human rights itself - no matter which reasons that country has for its behaviour.