13 May 2021

Common Sense and "Intelligence"

One of the most precious skills in life is "common sense" or "judgement." This is the ability to look at facts and to be able to judge what they actually mean and what the best cause of action is.

The tragedy is that it is so difficult to identify this skill in a person. We have plenty of ways of measuring other skills like musical prowess or sport achievements. But how can one tell whether someone has common sense?

A frequent temptation is to confuse intelligence and common sense, but there are some serious problems with that. One is that nobody really knows what "intelligence" means. There are plenty of definitions, often contradictory and rarely rigid. One definition is that "intelligence is to be able to handle given circumstances," which implies that most Nobel Prize laureates would be of inferior intelligence if given the task to survive on their own in the Kalahari desert or some remote part of the Amazonian jungles. They would not appear very smart even at a normal dinner, where they share no language with the host or the other guests. Another definition is that "intelligence is what is measured with intelligence tests," which is a fairly rigid but utterly useless definition.

But no matter the definition, intelligence is hardly the same thing as common sense. I once met a mathematician who said that in his experience, there is a negative correlation between intelligence and common sense - the more intelligent a person, the less common sense do they possess. I do not know if that is true, but I made a short list of skills a person may master without having any trace of common sense:

  • Memory games, like reciting thousands of decimals of pi or lines from the Iliad.
  • Scrabble, anagrams and word games.
  • Mathematics.
  • Academic research.
  • Foreign languages.
  • Writing poetry or gripping stories.
  • Reading complicated texts.
  • Social skills, like convincing voters that you are a great guy.
  • Humour.
  • Etc...

So those are some of many skills that do not guarantee that a person has common sense. I still do not know how one would measure common sense.

Socrates' famous words "I know that I know nothing," perfectly illustrate the point, as my claim that he pronounced them shows that I know nothing, because he actually never said it.

11 April 2021

Why I no longer think that the earth is flat

Short answer: I'm no child any more.

Every time someone claims that the contemporaries of Columbus thought the earth was flat, there are  other people who point out that "everyone" or "all educated people" have known that the earth was round at least since antiquity. Surely nobody could have been stupid enough to believe that the earth was flat?

Well, I did, once up on a time.

I remember being a child, asking myself if the surface of the earth had a limit. I may have been four years old. Perhaps three or five. I remember picturing someone walking in a forest, further and further away. "Can he walk forever?" I asked myself. "Or is there a stop somewhere?" I had not heard of any stop, so I assumed there was none, but could people really walk for ever on this flat surface? 

Some of you may think that I must have been precocious to have such interesting questions. I wasn't. I was dumb (already at that time).

I remember having those thoughts when I was standing next to the terrestrial globe of my grandfather. I made no connection at all. I could have said to myself: "there cannot be any limit, because the earth is round", but I didn't.

And if I have been stupid, I assume that other people have been stupid in similar ways. It would not surprise me at all, if large numbers of people in the olden days believed the earth was flat, in spite of enlightened people like Aristotle, Eratosthenes, Ptolemy, Aryabhata and many, many others.


A globe from 1765 by Guillaume Delisle. Wikipedia.